Proceedings of the XLVII Italian
Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress
Verona,
Italy - 24/27 September, 2003
ISBN 88-900622-4-X
Poster
Abstract - 2.32
PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS AND ISOTOPIC DISCRIMINATION IN
BARLEY GENOTYPES CONTRASTING FOR YIELD UNDER DROUGHT
F. RIZZA*, J.
GHASHGHAIE**, C. LELARGE***, L. CATTIVELLI*, N. DI FONZO****, A.M.
STANCA*
*)
Istituto Sperimentale Cerealicoltura, Via S. Protaso 302, 29017 Fiorenzuola
d’Arda (PC)
**)
Laboratoire d’ Ecophysiologie Végétale, Bât 362, Univ.
Paris Sud F-91405 Cedex, France
***) Laboratoire de Métabolisme
et Structure des Plantes, IBP Univ. Paris Sud F-91405 Cedex, France
****) Istituto Sperimentale Cerealicoltura, SS 16 Km 675,
71100 Foggia
barley,
drought, yield potential, yield stability, delta13C
The physiological, morphological and developmental
traits contributing to drought resistance are either constitutive or induced or
in some cases a combination of the two.
In this work 12 barley genotypes (6
six-rowed type and 6 two-rowed type) contrasting for yield potential and yield stability were selected on the
basis of field data recorded during three years (from 1999 to 2001) at Foggia (South Italy), where about
100 genotypes of different origin, year of release, rows type and growth habit
were evaluated in rainfed (R) and irrigated trials (I). The mean rainfall was
440 mm, 220 mm of which were received during the barley growing season.
The response of a
given genotype in R and I trials was compared for yield and associated traits.
Positive, highly significant
correlations were found for all traits analysed in field (plant height,
heading date, grain yield, kernel number m-2, kernel weight. High
yield in both R and I trials was achieved by the most productive genotypes
throughout different stategies, probably associated with genotypic traits
(higher kernel weight or higher kernel number, reduced plant height, early
heading) and conserved under the range of water availability that occurred in
the trials.
The 12 selected
genotypes were further analysed for carbon isotopic composition (delta13C)
of the grains harvested in the last season. The 13C discrimination,
as a measure of the integrated WUE during the kernel development (Farquahar and
Richards, 1984), was higher in the I trials for all tested genotypes. Higher
discrimination is sustained by a higher ratio of intercellular to external
partial pressure of CO2 during photosynthesis, due to a higher
stomatal conductance. Differences among genotypes for delta13C
were significant within both R
and I trials. The correlation between delta13C and yield was
significant when analysed across treatments, but not within treatments.
Apparently the stomatal conductance is not a trait that individually controls
yield. Indeed, the two genotypes with the lowest and the highest delta13C
belong both to the group of the low yielding genotypes. As shown for the other
traits, also for the delta13C of the grains the response of the
genotypes was conserved in R and I trials.
The overall data
are consistent with the hypothesis that selection under favourable conditions
allows to identify genotypes adpted to environments subjected to mild drought
because the same mechanisms which operate under favourable conditions seem to
work even at the levels of water limitation that occurred in our trials
References
Farquahar G.D. and R.A. Richards, 1984. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11: 539-552.