Proceedings of the XLVI Italian
Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress
Giardini
Naxos, Italy - 18/21 September, 2002
ISBN 88-900622-3-1
Round
Table Abstract - RT2
RISK
ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING OF
GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
SWEET J.
NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK
jeremy.sweet@niab.com
Under the precautionary
principles of developed countries, GMOs are subject to close scrutiny
regardless of the hazard associated with the transformation product, while
equally hazardous novel non-transformed products are not. The risk assessments
of GM plants are conducted on a case-by-case basis which evaluates the likely
impact of the transformed plant and other plants that the gene might enter. In
the case of genes confering novel traits it will be important to determine
their impact on plant behaviour, and their impact on phytophagus species
(including man), and other organisms associated with the GM plants. The
assessment should evaluate the risk to the release environments where the novel
plants will be grown. This may mean that a range of different ecosystems are
studied. The risk assessment will also take account of how the transformed
plant will be deployed in agriculture. Management practices may themselves be
novel and have an impact on the environment. For example novel resistance genes
producing PR proteins may replace the use of pesticides, and thus change the
relationship between the GM plant and phytophagus or pathogenic organisms.
Deployment of these crops can directly or indirectly effect biodiversity in
farming systems and thus it is important that these effects are evaluated.
In addition it will be
important to determine isolation measures for non-food and pharmaceutical GM
crops so that the novel products are in distinct and separate chains of
production and supply.
Recent changes in EU
regulations will require that environmental impact evaluations are conducted prior to the commercialisation of
GM crops and that monitoring is conducted to confirm these evaluations. GM
crops are being compared to current cropping practices at a time when there are
serious concerns about the sustainability of these practices. Thus the question
arises as to whether the appropriate comparisons are being made or whether we
should only be embracing new technologies which have a more favourable
environmental audit.
In addition questions
are being asked about GM crops which have not been considered for conventional
crops. Thus, in order for risk assessments and biodiversity evaluations to be
conducted on GM crops, more information is needed on the ecology of current
farming systems. This will allow impacts to be measured against existing
standards, and also the significance of these impacts on wildlife to be more
fully understood.
In some instances GM
crops, combined with appropriate management can provide novel approaches for
enhancing biodiversity within crops. Research and monitoring in the future is
needed to measure impacts and to ensure good stewardship of GM crops.
Monitoring should include random sampling of appropriate biodiversity
indicators to keep track of
ecological impacts on farming systems.