Proceedings of the XLVI Italian
Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress
Giardini
Naxos, Italy - 18/21 September, 2002
ISBN 88-900622-3-1
Poster
Abstract - 4.18
MOLECULAR
PROFILING OF GM-MAIZE LINES AS RELATED TO THE ISSUE OF ESSENTIAL DERIVATION
BORGO
L., SERANI B., CONTI S.
Department
of Agroenviromental Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Via Filippo
Re 6-8, 40126 Bologna, Italy
maize, essential derivation, AFLP, somaclonal
variation, GMO
Essential
derivation is an important issue for the protection of breeders’ rights
and for defining appropriate levels of royalties. So far, similarity thresholds
for declaring essential derivation have not been clearly defined, also due to
the difficulty in (I) correctly estimating genetic distances based on
morphological and biochemical markers and (II) establishing precise confidence
intervals of such estimates. In alternative to morphological and biochemical
markers, DNA-based markers provide a more powerful and precise diagnostic tool
to verify the degree of genetic similarity for those categories of genetic
materials more likely to be classified under the category of essential derived
variety (EDV). Genetically modified (GM) plants represent an interesting case
for this type of study, due to the presence of novel sequence variation
introduced through the gene/s directly manipulated and, more importantly for
the EDV issue, for the presence of new genetic variability due to somaclonal
variation arisen during the in vitro phase. The objective of our research,
conducted within an EU-funded project (MMEDV) investigating the EDV issue in a
number of crop species, has been to verify to what extent somaclonal variation
affects the genetic similarity between GM maize and the donor lines. Six sets
of T1, T2, T3 and T4 GM-seed, kindly provided by B. Gengenbach (University of
Minnesota), were considered for this study. T0 plants were regenerated from
calli proliferated from immature embryos explanted from a cross between two
sister lines (derived from an A188 x B73 genetic background); calli were
genetically engineered using the bar gene as
selectable marker introduced with the particle gun. Seed of the two sister
lines and the F1 hybrid was provided along with the GM seed. For each one of
the transgenic groups, the two parental lines and the F1, DNA was extracted
from 12 plants. For the parental lines, DNA was extracted from each plant
separately. For the F1, T1, T2, T3 and T4 sets, DNA was extracted from a bulk
of leaf tissue of all plants. So far, we have tested 13 AFLP primer combinations
(PCs) based on EcoRI (rare cutter) and two isoschizomers (HpaI and MspII)
recognizing the same restriction site (CCGG) and showing different sensitivity
to cytosine methylation, a major cause of somaclonal variation. In
consideration that transposon-based activity is also an important cause of
somaclonal variation in maize, nine REMAP PCs were also considered. Cluster
analysis was conducted with NTSYS and similarity estimates among genotypes were
calculated according to the Dice coefficient. The 13 AFLP PCs revealed 109 polymorphisms. A considerable
number of these bands (90 in total) were found polymorphic also between and/or
within the control (non-GM) genotypes (parental sister lines and their hybrid),
while only 19 were truly polymorphic between the non-GM and the GM-derived
materials. Therefore, cluster analysis was conducted using the set with only 19
bands. The overall level of diversity shown with this set of 19 AFLPs was low;
in fact, the average similarity level was higher than 0.99. The nine REMAP PCs
revealed 10 new polymorphisms between the parental lines and the GM-derived
progenies. The results obtained with cluster analysis with the REMAP markers
were rather similar to those obtained with AFLPs and indicated a low level (ca.
1%) of genetic diversity. Because the level of genetic diversity in the
materials examined herein is low, a large number of bands should be examined in
order to draw sound conclusions on the precise level of polymorphism present in
GM-derived materials due to somaclonal variation. As to the relevance of this
work for the issue of essential derivation, the low level of polymorphism
attributable to somaclonal variation can be disregarded in EDV considerations
concerning GM maize, particularly when the commercialized GM maize hybrids are
obtained using GM lines backcrossed with non-GM lines, thus unaffected by
somaclonal variation.