Proceedings
of the XLV Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress
Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy - 26/29 September, 2001
ISBN 88-900622-1-5
Oral Communication Abstract
NEW
INSIGHTS INTO THE ROLE OF GIBBERELLINS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARTHENOCARPIC
TOMATO OVARIES
OLIMPIERI I., TILESI F., BERALDI D., TESTA G., MAZZUCATO A.
Dipartimento di Agrobiologia e Agrochimica, Sezione di
Genetica, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Via S.C. de Lellis snc,
01100 Viterbo, Italy
mazz@unitus.it
fruit
set, gibberellins, Lycopersicon esculentum, parthenocarpy, tomato
Gibberellins
(GAs) are involved in most aspects of plant growth and development. Among them,
GAs play a key role, together with auxin, in supporting the development of the
ovary into fruit after the reproductive process has been successfully
accomplished. It has been suggested that natural parthenocarpy, i.e. the
production of seedless fruits, may be the result of elevate hormone levels in
the ovary in the absence of pollination and fertilisation.
To study
genetic and physiological determinants that drive fruit set and early
development in parthenocarpic tomato ovaries, we use an experimental system
based on genetically parthenocarpic mutants. All the experiments compared the
behaviour of two near-isogenic lines: one bears recessive alleles for the parthenocarpic
fruit (pat) gene and the other is
homozygous wild-type at the same locus (WT). In addition to parthenocarpy, the pat
mutant shows several pleiotropic effects, such as early flowering, anther
shortness and carpelloidy, aberrant ovule integument development and defective
pollen tube guidance. Several approaches have been undertaken, such as
treatments with GA3 and GA-inhibitors, differential display between
ovary mRNA populations and expression analysis of genes involved in the GA
biosynthetic and signal transduction pathway.
Treatments
with GA3 were able to stimulate the development of parthenocarpic
fruits in the WT line, while fruit set in the mutant was not altered. On the
contrary, treatments with the GA biosynthetic inhibitor Paclobutrazol
completely suppressed parthenocarpy in the pat mutant,
where fruit set was severely impaired. Conversely, when Paclobutrazol was given
together with GA3, its inhibitory effect on parthenocarpy was fully
counteracted. However, nor GA3 nor Paclobutrazol were able to
restore the WT phenotype in pat mutant floral organs.
From
differential display analysis, genes that are responsive to GAs have been
identified. Among them, an alcohol dehydrogenase-like sequence, up-regulated in
the parthenocarpic ovary before anthesis, shows a specific expression in the
first cell layers below the epidermis of the placenta, a tissue that is
primarily involved in the early parthenocarpic ovary development.
The strong
involvement of abnormal GA levels in the pat mutant
phenotype was suggested also by the altered expression levels of genes involved
in GA biosynthesis (GA 20-oxydases, GA 3b-hydroxylase)
and regulation (SPINDLY). Such expression patterns suggest
a putative accumulation of GA20 and a shift of the biosynthesis
towards the development of endogenous GA3, an alteration observed in
other parthenocarpic tomato mutants, non allelic to pat.
Our results
add some pieces of knowledge to the complicated framework of hormonal signals
that regulates fruit set. In perspective, this information may put the basis
for engineering parthenocarpy by modifying the expression of plant genes
involved in hormone synthesis and perception.