Proceedings of the XLV Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress

Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy - 26/29 September, 2001

ISBN 88-900622-1-5

 

Poster Abstract

 

 

PRELIMINARY STUDIES FOR OBTAINING FUNCTIONAL MARKERS IN TUBULIN GENES OF BARLEY

 

VIGNANI R., SENSI E., SCALI M., CRESTI M.

 

Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Siena

scalimoni@unisi.it

 

 

tubulin, cytoskeleton, functional markers, Hordeum vulgare

 

Cytoskeleton is an ubiquitous structure which participates to multiple crucial developmental processes in plant and animal cells. Microtubules whose protofilaments are heterodimers of a and b tubulin, are among the structural components of the cytoskeleton and in plant cells they are involved in many processes such as cell division, intracellular transport and control of cell shape. Cortical microtubules array forms a complex dynamic structure which is supposed to take a significative role in the regulation of the intracellular streaming occurring in growing pollen tube (1). The pollen tube is a suitable and convenient model for the study of plant cytoskeleton functionality and regulation (2) since it exhibits such a high speed of space-directional elongation which is promoted by the intracellular streaming. The complex morphological dynamism which is observed in the pollen tube cytoskeleton makes this type of cell a good system for investigating the putative tubulin isotype specialization during a crucial developmental phase of higher plants such as the pollen tube emission and growth.

 

Plant tubulin genes have been characterized in many different species (3, 4), but the pattern of expression of each either a or b characterized gene is best known for Arabidopsis thaliana (5, 6, 7) and Zea mais (8).

 

The development of assay for functionally relevant regions of the genome is a recent aim of the scientific community involved in biodiversity conservation.

 

A set of different barley cultivars has been screened in order to verify the stability of a microsatellite element which is present in the upstream region of the a- tubulin 1 gene in order to see if this region could be used as possible DNA marker related to tubulin genes.

 

Current PCR based techniques have been used to evaluate the potentiality of such region of the genome to act as functional marker. Primers anchored in the conserved regions on cDNA, which include the microsatellite, lead to production of a major band of approximately 1100bp. Sequence analysis of this product revealed the presence of an intervening sequence of 896 bp which could be interpreted as a non-coding region (putative intron I) of the gene coding for a-tubulin1. The putative intron in barley is positioned at aa position 38 in agreement to Arabidopsis intron I position of TUA5, 3 and 1. Sequences present in GeneBank coding for tubulins in Hordeum vulgare include six different accessions for a-isoforms coding genes, three for b-tubulins and one for g-tubulin. None of the sequence available for this species reports a description of intervening sequences.

 

Preliminary sequence alignment of 1100 bp PCR products obtained for 3 different barley cultivars shows that they are almost identical except for a few point mutations in the intron.

 

Further analysis of the intervening sequence isolated show the presence of several consensus motifs and of generic splicing sites. The GT-AT rule is followed and a branch consensus sequence is located at –31 nt (TATTAAT). The putative intron region shows an AT content which reaches 58% against 36-38% with respect to related coding parts of the same gene.

 

 

 

(1)              Cai et al. 1997, Trends in Plant Sci 2: 86-91

(2)              Moscatelli et al. 1995, J Cell Sci 108: 1117-1125

(3)              Fosket 1989, In the biochemistry of plants, Vol. 15 PK Stumpf ed., New York, Academic Press pp. 392-454

(4)              Hussey et al. 1991, The cytoskeletal basis of plant growth and form, C.W. Lloyd ed., London, Academic Press

(5)              Kopczac et al. 1992, Plant Cell 4, 539-547;

(6)              Snustad 1992, Plant Cell  4: 549-556;

(7)              Chu et al 1998, Plant Mol Biol 37: 785-790

(8)              Villemur et al.,1994 Plant Mol Biol 24: 295-315